


























 |
Ticketing Info for Forum Panel Sessions
Registration for the forum panel sessions are required.
For the Educator’s Workshop and the Film Curriculum: Case Studies panel sessions, tickets are $15 each. Each ticket to the rest of the panel sessions is $5 for adult and $4 for students. All tickets are available at The Substation box office
from 1 September 2005 onwards. Opening hours: Monday to Friday
12 - 8.30 pm, Tel: 65-6337 7800. For enquires, please email
forum@asianfilmarchive.org.
For details on how to get a free pass to the panel sessions
on Pen-ek Ratanaruang and Eric Khoo, please refer to their
write-ups below.
Schedule is correct at the time of printing. Films and sessions
may be cancelled or rescheduled due to unforeseen circumstances.
Rating to be advised.
 |
Asian
Filmmakers and the Call of Social Memory
Producers of national cinemas are deeply aware
of the “need” for film to serve as pop cultural
inscriptions of social, cultural, political, and
national memories. These inscriptions are
discursive in the sense that they are
constrained by various social, cultural,
political, and ideological forces delimiting
their nature and scope. What constitutes these
forces, and what is their impact on Asian
national cinemas? How do Asian filmmakers work
with, within, or around these forces to inscribe
their work with varied notions of social memory,
be they institutionally sanctioned or critically
alternative forms?
Chaired by Dr Kenneth Paul Tan, Chair of Asian
Film Archive. Panel: Prof. Roland Tolentino,
Director of University of Philippines Film
Institute; Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied,
University of London’s School of Oriental and
African Studies; Anchalee Chaiworaporn, Founder
of Thai Cinema; Anwardi Datuk Jamil, film critic
and director; Prof. Eloisa May P. Hernandez, University
of the Philippines in Diliman.
Abstracts
1. Khairudin Aljunied
This paper provides a critical "reading" and
examination of the P. Ramlee’s film, Seniman
Bujang Lapok. Central to its argument is the
appropriation of such a film as historical
sources for the study of Malay society in
1950s-1960s Singapore. By contextualising P.
Ramlee’s portrayal of Malay society within
several key developments in his life and era,
the article propounds some major themes that
reflect the challenges and anxieties faced by
Malays then. It is hoped that this article will
induce scholars towards a rigorous interrogation
of Malay films that are currently at the margins
of Singapore's historiography.
2. Anwardi Datuk Jamil
'Malaysian Cinema: "Filem Kita Wajah Kita"
(Our Film Our Image): Social Memory or Selective
Memory'. The above motto is the motto that has
been promoted by Malaysia’s National Film
Development Corporate for over ten years. It is
the motto that currently fits well with the
industry players who keep on churning movies
that promotes national and political interests
above all else. What one sees on the Malaysian
screens are hardly images or visuals that are
based on reality. Therefore, Malaysian cinema on
the whole if viewed by our descendants three
generations on, will see a Malaysia that they
will never relate to – a warped sense of social
memory that didn’t exist except in the cinemas.
It is the same feeling current generations feel
when they see the old Malay movies from the P.
Ramlee era – laced and fueled by Hindustani
values and images, current audience are made to
believe that that was how the Malays lived in
the 60s when it is not. It was an opportunity
lost – a chance for filmmakers to capture
reality on film – true content for future social
memory but alas very few Malay movies have
managed if ever, to portray the Malays or
Malaysians on the wide screen. This paper is to
begin a discourse that will identify the new
trends by young filmmakers who prefer to ground
their films with more realism and with a
Malaysia that rings true.
3. Anchalee Chaiworaporn
'Nationalism and Nostalgia: Two Conflicting
Identities in New Thai Cinema'. This paper will
examine how different the old and new-generation
directors of New Thai cinema, who together
helped construct the boom of Thai cinema after
the Asian economic crisis in 1997, choose to
tell the stories in their entry, firstly into
the Thai film industry, and then the global
circle. While the older generations (for those
who had already established and struggled to
survive during the pre-1997 deadend of the
industry) construct a nationalistic identity by
employing and exploiting the Thai historical
facts like Bang Rajan, and Suriyothai, the
new-generation filmmakers (for those who just
emerged in the year of 1997) prefer to limit
themselves to more personal identities and
nostalgic sentiments. I will look at both the
socio-economic contexts that helped boost the
ideology a few years before, during, and after
the crisis when it is involved in all walks of
Thai life, and the textual analysis in their
different construction of identities. However,
when the country faced the economic downturn,
these remedies corresponded with the phenomenal
construction of national identity, which have
been promoted by the governments and again, by
the King’s motto, “Sufficiency Economy.” In
fact, cinema is just one of several art forms
that manifested this national concept.
4. Prof Eloisa May P. Hernandez
Human rights violations are rampant, corruption
exists in the entire government system, cheating
in elections involve the highest officials of
the land, the value of the Philippine peso is
drastically dropping, the specter of martial law
hangs over the country, the Marcoses are in
power, their cronies control the businesses, and
the people are taking to the streets with calls
for the resignation of the President.
Philippines 1986? No, it’s Philippines 2005.
Memories of the dictatorship and the political
and social system that it operated on still hold
power in the Philippines. Nothing has changed -
we are where we were 20 years ago. Having lived
through the dictatorship, it weighs heavy on my
memories. Ramona Diaz’s film Imelda (2003),
probably the most watched documentary in the
history of Philippine cinema, revives in the
social memories of millions of Filipinos,
including me, the rise to power and subsequent
fall of the complex, ruthless, vain, and
oftentimes “imeldific” First Lady, Imelda
Romualdez Marcos. Sometimes painful, surreal and
absurd to watch, the documentary vacillates from
portraying Imelda as a pitiful, albeit bitter,
widow as the director lets her condemn herself
when she starts to draw hearts to show her love
for the Filipino people and sings a love song to
the body of her dead husband. Human rights
violations rampant during her and her husband’s
20 years regime is erased in her personal
memories but attested by victims/survivors who
gave personal accounts in the film. It is
obvious that there is a stark difference between
Imelda Romualdez Marcos’s personal memories and
the national social memory of the Filipino
people. The film inscribes in the memories of
the Filipino youth, those fortunate enough not
to have memories of dictatorship, a social
memory of what the rest of the Filipinos went
through and hopefully liberates them and the
country from the dictatorship of memories.
5. Prof Roland Tolentino
The experience of modernity results from the
emergent social relations formed in liberalized
market economies, which also posit as sites of
newer forms of pain and suffering as especially
experienced by those in the margins. South
Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines share the
nationalist experience of trauma and popular
uprising to topple dictatorial governments,
paving the way for intensified economic
development. As national economies undergo
liberalization to survive in globalization, so
do their political structures are reshaped to
become conducive to transnational capital. The
essay discusses the relationship of the state
and civil society in a postcolonial national
setting, looking into their operations and
parameters in the South Korean film A Single
Spark. The analysis of the effects of the state
and civil society on issues of citizenship and
urban being is discussed in the Taiwanese film
Super Citizen Ko. The transformation of the
national into the transnational state and civil
society is discussed in the Philippine film
Eskapo.
|
|
|
 |
The Educator’s Workshop
Film can be an exciting educational text and
tool for the classroom. Most teachers are
beginning to realize that not only can cinema be
used outside of the film class, but that
students also respond very well to this medium
in various classroom situations. This session
hopes to bring together those interested in the
pedagogical use of film in order to share ideas
on how one can use film more effectively and in
more creative ways. What are some of the
techniques of including film in your lesson
plans? How can film play a role in students’
research projects?
Chaired by Vijay Chandran, Head of Advanced
Diploma Film Programme, Ngee Ann Polytechnic.
Panel: Herman Van Eyken, Head of new Film School
(BA), LaSalle-SIA, College of the Arts; Jeanine
Tan, University of Melbourne; Emmeline Yong,
Founder of Objectifs (Centre for Film and
Photography).
Abstracts
1. Jeanine Tan
We live in a world increasingly dominated by
screens and visual texts in the form of film,
documentary, animation, interactive computer
games, paintings, photographs, cartoons, comics,
internet images/videos, picture books,
advertisements, music videos, and the list goes
on. Film, an art form that is over a century
old, has earned its right to be included as a
major area of study in its own right. While
there are many courses on film studies at the
tertiary level, film education has hardly made
its way into the primary and secondary
classroom. Yet there are many benefits to be
gained from film education. Film can be included
as a text to aid the teaching of other subjects.
Film can, and should, also be studied as a
primary text. It is important in a screen-based
culture that students are encouraged to identify
and understand the codes and conventions
employed by film and gain critical distance from
the text. The Screen Education programme at the
Australian Centre for the Moving Image (ACMI) in
Melbourne presents us with a successful model
which we might be able to modify to our local
environment. Their programs encourage dynamic
thinking, interaction and activity in which
popular hands-on production experiences sit
alongside traditional learning environments such
as film lecture programs. ACMI’s screen
education staff cater to primary and secondary
students, and cover key areas of the Victorian
curriculum.
2. Emmeline Yong
Filmmaking: The Art of Telling a Story. The root
of a good short film lies in a story that is
well told – one that effectively conveys
viewpoints or arouses emotive responses. Using
films and filmmaking as a medium for
storytelling, we can encourage students to learn
how to create, develop and communicate ideas.
During our short discussion, we will share with
the audience how we have used film and
filmmaking in our outreach workshops with
schools. One of the projects we will talk about
is The Traveling Short Film Project, a film
outreach program that brings a collection of
local short films to schools in Singapore. This
program is jointly organized by Objectifs, The
Substation Moving Images and independent film
curator Yuni Hadi, and has been brought to
almost 20 schools.
|
|
|
 |
The Film Curriculum: Case Studies
This session complements the “The Educator’s
Workshop” in terms of offering a practical
hands-on presentation and discussion of using
film as part of one’s teaching. A number of case
studies on the use of short films will be
presented followed by a discussion on the
educational practices one could deploy around
these films.
Chaired by Yuni Hadi, Film Curator,
inaugural Singapore Shorts DVD Compilation.
Panel: Francis Lau, filmmaker and General Paper
teacher at Raffles Junior College; other local filmmakers include Wee Li Lin, Tan Pin
Pin, Han Yew Kwang and Sun Koh. |
|
|
 |
Preserving Film Heritage
The work of archiving films is a complex one.
How does one negotiate the kinds of film to
archive? What forms of technical expertise and
hardware are required? What is involved in film
history and archival education? What role does
an archive play in the cultural education of a
society or a nation? What is the role of an
archive or library in the creation of social
memory? What is the relationship between an
archive and the national censors? What is the
state of film archival in Asia and what are the
challenges in the dawn of digital cinema?
The panel session will end at 11.30am and be
followed by a half-hour visit to the National
Archives of Singapore at Fort Canning. Due to
space constraints, this will be limited to first
15 people who registered.
Chaired by Irene Lim, deputy director, National
Archives of Singapore. Panel: Benjamin McKay,
Charles Darwin University, Australia; Chalida Uabumrungjit, archivist and Project Director,
Thai Film Foundation.
Abstract
1. Benjamin McKay
Research Methodology and the Archival Dilemma.
The manner in which a film historian, or any
other researcher using cinematic texts from the
past, approaches the task of researching their
project is largely determined by the theoretical
and practical boundaries of research
methodology. The theoretical boundaries of that
methodological approach are often determined by
what is and is not available to a researcher.
Film History is largely empirical, but the very
fact that many film texts either do not exist or
cannot be found, has forced Film Historians to
fill in the gaps of their research by employing
a more subjective, speculative and assumptive
approach to their work. Such an approach is
seemingly at odds with the supposedly empirical
nature of the historical profession and the
discourse on empiricism is thus being
challenged. This presentation will address the
manner in which researchers have to be flexible
in their telling ofthe past and in their search
for the ‘truth’ by the very limitations of the
archival network.
Researchers are also influenced by the politics
of the past and the present. This is evident in
the manner in which certain textual sources are
not made available to them by the state as part
of a broader culture of censorship. Indeed there
is evidence that some film texts were destroyed
in the past due to their content. Censorship and
the politics of controlling knowledge have an
enormous impact upon what can and cannot be
researched. From a researchers perspective this
presentation will address the issues of
censorship and will make proposals for the
manner in which archivists might be able to work
within a culture of censorship, and still be
able to meet the requirements of their clients.
Such proposals will be informed by case studies
from archives elsewhere.
Film History that uses filmic textual analysis
as a primary source is concerned with social
memory. Researchers are often engaged in the
construction of narratives that reveal their
‘truth’ at the point where film can be seen as
both an agent and a source of history. The
understanding of the past through cinematic
analysis is informed as much by an understanding
of the present. History is not written in a
vacuum. This presentation will address the
search for social memory by the film historian.
Such an analysis will be informed by the
presenters’ own research project on developing a
social history of Singapore and the Malay world
in the 1950s and 1960s through a reading of the
films that were produced locally at that time.
It will also address the many dilemmas that such
a project encounters in accessing the films
themselves.
|
|
|
 |
Writing About Film
Film criticism in the news media contributes
significantly to one’s social memory about
specific cinemas. This session will deliberate
on various aspects of journalistic approaches to
viewing and writing about film. How does one
enter the profession of film journalism? What
are some of the salient modes of criticism that
film journalists deploy? What are the latest
trends in writing about film in the media? What
are the alternatives to the mainstream press
where one could get published? How can film
writing contribute to the development of Asian
film cultures?
Chaired by Ong Sor Fern, Film Correspondent
Life! Straits Times. Panel: Ben Slater, author
of an upcoming book on Saint Jack; Joanne Soh, a
film journalist, First Magazine; Anchalee
Chaiworaporn, FIPRESCI member and correspondent
to Cannes Critics Week; Alexis Tioseco, film
critic, indiefilipino.
Abstract
1. Ben Slater
Under Pressure - Film Criticism In The Digital
Age.
The role of film criticism has always been a
tenuous and unstable one. Cinema is a
notoriously difficult medium to assess - it
draws from and fuses many different art-forms,
while being constantly dominated by commercial
and industrial practices. In looking at film the
'critic' needs to be able to access a wide range
of influences and references, and not just from
film, he or she needs to understand the business
of movies, as well as to carefully articulate
arguments about a film's particular strengths
and weaknesses. The whole form of 'film
reviewing' has come under pressure over the last
ten years, firstly the rise of Film Studies as a
academic subject has opened up many new ways of
critically exploring film. Secondly, film
marketing has sought to overturn the power of
the critic in order to make certain products
'critic-proof'. Lastly, the internet has changed
the landscape of how film opinion is circulated
and discussed. These three factors have
radically altered the ways that we critically
receive film.
I propose to discuss these two strands - the
'problem' of film reviewing in the first place;
and changes in the process of film reception
partly brought on by New Media - and try to
determine how film criticism may develop from
here. |
|
|
 |
Focus on Pen-ek Ratanaruang
Pen-ek Ratanaruang's works include Invisible Waves (2005), Last
Life in the Universe (2003), Transistor Love
Story (2001), 6ixtynin9 (1999) and Fun Bar
Karaoke (1997) and have garnered international
critical acclaim. This session will account for
his success by mapping some of the major
thematic and critical concerns of his work. The
director will also let us in on the new
Invisible Waves and will enter into discussions
with the audience. Chaired by Assistant
Professor Kenneth Chan.
Ask for one free pass to this panel session if
you purchased, at the same time, tickets for all
4 screenings to Pen-ek Ratanaruang's
retrospective. First come first served. Subject
to availability. |
|
|
 |
Transnational / Transcultural Asian Cinema
The relative youth of Asian Cinema, vis-à-vis
the cinemas of the United States and Europe, has
led to a culturalist concern to develop national
cinemas. But with the impact of globalization
and late capitalist modes of production and
distribution, Asian cinema cannot but be
overdetermined as transnational forms, or what
film scholars are now calling “transcultural”
products. What does it mean then when a
Singaporean film, for instance, is to be called
“transcultural” despite its “Singaporean”
features? What aesthetic, political, social, or
cultural impact does the conception of
transnationalism and transculturalism have on
Asian cinema? What are the theoretical trends
motivating or emerging from these conceptions?
Are there significant critical opportunities or
risks that these movements offer or portend?
Chaired by Prof Wee Wan-Ling, National Institute
of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Panel: Professor Chua Beng Huat, Asia
Research Institute, National University of
Singapore; Daniel Yun, CEO of Raintree Pictures;
Pen-ek Ratanaruang, filmmaker.
Abstracts
1. Daniel Yun
The expression – Pan-Asian films used to be
fairly meaningless to filmmakers. Now it is not
unlike European films, e.g. a very Pan-Asian HK
film is similar to a very European film from
England. The next phase of filmmaking in Asia
will not be led by HK or India alone, but it
will be more of an Asian movement.
As part of global cinema, where world box office
is now increasingly more important to Hollywood
studios than just North America, where formulaic
summer blockbusters are increasingly more risky,
the transnational, transcultural cinema is
taking root even with Hollywood studios as they
hurriedly set up their ‘classic’ extension –
Sony Classic, Fox Searchlight, Warner
Independent and Lion Gate films. These smaller
companies help the global cinema phenomenon.
Yet Transnational and Transcultural cinema is
most pronounced and is the most recent
phenomenon in Asia. With strong demand from a
global market, the fusion of identities, the
cross cover of influence and the sharing of
funding and risks are less of an option and more
a necessity. The increasing use of CG and
effects is also blurring the cultural lines.
Ultimately the emergence of Transnational,
Trancultural cinema, the concept of borderless
movie concepts can thrive because audiences
around the world are more international. The
world is a much smaller place. Internet links
the most remote of places to the most cutting
edge cities and the result is a fusion of ideas,
views and cultural beliefs. If movies are a true
reflection of life, this evolving process is
inevitable.
|
|
|
 |
Roundtable: The
Independent Film Industry in Asia
The myth of the poor starving artist often rings
true in the context of independent filmmaking,
particularly in Asia. This session seeks to map
the terrain for both the aspiring filmmaker and
the established auteur. What kinds of financial
resources are available for filmmaking? What are
the creative hurdles and peaks that one should
focus on? How does one define an audience for a
film? What strategies should an aspiring
filmmaker have to ensure the successful
completion, promotion, and distribution of her
film? What censorship issues should the
filmmaker be concerned about? What challenges
face the independent film industries in Asia?
How does one build a community in this industry?
Chaired by Jacqueline Tan, Lecturer, Ngee Ann
Polytechnic. Panel: Singapore filmmaker
Tan Pin Pin; Tan Chih Chong, Managing Director of Sitting
in Pictures and producer of The Outsiders/Forever
Fever;
Alexis Tioseco, film critic, indiefilipino; Chalida Uabumrungjit, Project
Director, Thai Film Foundation. |
|
|
 |
Focus on Eric Khoo – Forum on Asian Cinema
Eric Khoo has emerged as one of Singapore's
premier filmmakers, taking to the world stage at
Cannes this year. While Singapore prides itself
in having another cinematic voice to represent
the country, Khoo has also tapped into
alternative aspects of Singaporean life to fill
the cinematic screen. This session will
deliberate on why his films resonate with both
Singapore and international audiences,
particularly in light of Khoo's artistic
choices; and how these narrative and thematic
choices interact with the concept of national
representation and identity. The director
himself will be present to talk about and to
respond to the reception of his films. Chaired
by Assistant Professor Kenneth Paul Tan.
Ask for one free pass to this panel session if
you purchased at the same time, tickets for all
3 screenings to Eric Khoo's retrospective at the
same time. First come first served. Subject to
availability. |
|
|
 |
|